 |
| ENGLISH | |
 |
 |
|
Brussels sprouts
It's all the fault of the USA
by André Brie
The author is deputy of the
European Parliament, where he belongs to the fraction of the
United European Left (GUE/NGL).
If you believe the picture drawn by
most media, the USA are to blame for the current global
financial and economic crisis. Most European politicians have
adopted the new anti-Americanism. However, the current situation
is by no means an “accident“ or the consequence of irresponsible
action of individuals or solely of the USA. Of course, there is
no doubt that the policy that led to the current disaster was
begun in the USA. However, there still need to be added
substantial touches to the picture drawn even by German
government members and their European colleagues.
As a matter of fact, the deepest
and also the least-discussed cause, even within the Left, of the
breakdown is the policy of massive redistribution from below to
the top, even and in particular in Europe. In the past three
decades, it has led to the accumulation of gigantic financial
means in very few hands and it has at the same time hurt mass
consumption. At the top, there was more and more disposable
liquid capital that it was hard to invest in reasonable ways
into the real economy, below there was less and less money for
consumption. The US government and, partly even more strongly,
the West European governments created new markets for this
capital abundance: in the financial area itself, last but not
least by casino capitalism, by the privatisation of public
enterprises and services, by an aggressive free trade capitalism.
It was only by these conditions of exploitation that the “greed“
of the managers, share and funds owners was able to unload
itself.
Moreover, a very active German and
European policy promoted the liberalisation of the financial
markets. In fact, the Maastricht Treaty (1992) introduced a
radical monetarism. The European Central Bank was withdrawn from
any political and macroeconomic control. In 1999, the EU
Commission decided the plan for financial services with forty
liberalisation measures that the European governments
implemented with the Lisbon Strategy starting in 2000. Added to
that is the fact that the EU reacted just as passively to the
course of the USA, which by their financial and imperial war
policy built up a debt economy, as to the intransparence of the
international financial markets, but that it contributed
actively, however, to the deregulation of the financial markets.
We need not wait for solutions for
the USA. In particular, the European scopes for manoeuvre are
great. What is required in the EU is, in particular, the ending
of the Lisbon strategy, the wage and corporate tax competition
among states, of social demolition, of deregulation and
privatisation and redistribution of social wealth towards the
top. “Casino capitalism“ needs to be really controlled – empty
sales, credit derivatives, and hedge-funds must be interdicted
all over Europe, tax allowances and advantages for financial
speculation must be eliminated. There also must be stopped the
privatisation of old-age prevention, the European firm pensions
directive must be changed fundamentally.
Large private banks who no longer
fulfil their economic policy role and insurance companies belong
under state control or into state hands. And last but not least,
there would be required strong European and national business
recovery programmes, which would strengthen mass purchasing
power and the interior market, would lower the insecurity of the
wage dependent, the unemployed and the pensioneers, promote
regional economic circuits, local small and medium-type
businesses and the urgently required ecological reconstruction.
|
|
|
|
|